“Wunderkammern, or cabinets of curiosities, arose in
mid-sixteenth-century Europe as repositories for all manner of wondrous and
exotic objects. In essence these collections—combining specimens, diagrams, and
illustrations from many disciplines; marking the intersection of science and
superstition; and drawing on natural, manmade, and artificial worlds—can be
seen as the precursors to museums.”
—“Wunderkammer: A Century of Curiosities” MoMA (2008)
“Wunderkammer or curiosity cabinets were created as a result
of a growing desire among the peoples of Europe to place mankind accurately
within the grand scheme of nature and the divine. This need developed during
the fourteenth century and continued into the seventeenth century. The
Renaissance wunderkammer, like the modern museum, were subject to preservation
and interpretation. However, they differed from the modern museum in some
fundamental aspects of purpose and meaning. Renaissance wunderkammer were private
spaces, created and formed around a deeply held belief that all things were
linked to one another through either visible or invisible similarities. People
believed that by detecting those visible and invisible signs and by recognizing
the similarities between objects, they would be brought to an understanding of
how the world functioned, and what humanity’s place in it was.”
—“History of the Wunderkammern (cabinet of curiosities),” Tate UK (2003)
—“History of the Wunderkammern (cabinet of curiosities),” Tate UK (2003)
I think Jeff Decker’s life might be well understood as a sort
of cabinet of curiosities. For the sake of this post, though, I should probably
focus things here to just say that Jeff Decker’s studio is a cabinet of curiosities.
Earlier this year I was offered a chance to write short
piece responding to an artistic work (painting, sculpture, photography, etc.)
for the upcoming Mormon Art Center Festival, taking place in NYC later this
summer. I am not an art critic and this was not to be art criticism. The
proposal was kind of a blind date type of arrangement, since it was only after saying
“yes” that writers were shown the work they were responding to. And it wasn’t
until I was sent an image of sculptor Jeff Decker’s piece that I knew I was in
trouble. What to say about the front end of a taxidermied rhino, regaled with
spoils, saddled and ridden by a type of grotesque, chubby homunculus—and was
that canopy the carapace of a sea tortoise? By now I was absolutely intrigued,
but where to begin?
Once I’d decided on a set of short fables as the way to approach this, I decided to take my friend Laura up on her suggestion to arrange a visit to Jeff’s Hippodrome Studio in Springville, UT. She got me his contact info and he graciously set aside a Saturday afternoon last month to meet me there. I brought a notebook and camera, on which I’d stupidly set the ISO wrong, but some of the photos still turned out alright. I would describe Hippodrome as just as much a collection or museum (a shrine of the Muses) as it is also a working shop. And in this post I can only begin to scratch the surface of what turned out to be easily one of the most fascinating conversations I’ve had in my life.
Once I’d decided on a set of short fables as the way to approach this, I decided to take my friend Laura up on her suggestion to arrange a visit to Jeff’s Hippodrome Studio in Springville, UT. She got me his contact info and he graciously set aside a Saturday afternoon last month to meet me there. I brought a notebook and camera, on which I’d stupidly set the ISO wrong, but some of the photos still turned out alright. I would describe Hippodrome as just as much a collection or museum (a shrine of the Muses) as it is also a working shop. And in this post I can only begin to scratch the surface of what turned out to be easily one of the most fascinating conversations I’ve had in my life.
Any time spent googling Jeff Decker, will
immediately and overwhelmingly acquaint you with his fantastic work restoring
and sculpting exquisite, badass vintage motorcycles. He’s also well known as the
only person in the world authorized to sculpt historic Harley-Davidsons. He’s
often—and very fittingly, I’d say—referred to as a Frederic Remington of
motorcycle sculpture. As I got out of my truck and came up the walk, I’m
certain he could already tell I knew nothing about motorcycles before I even
reached the porch for a handshake.
But that was OK. This left us plenty else to talk about, and
before too long I realized we had all of the following in common:
- A shared love for scrounging things from the dump.
- And for Cormac McCarthy, Tom Waits, Basil Wolverton, and
Ed “Big Daddy” Roth.
- An unapologetic proclivity for going out into the back
yard to piss, day or night.
- Both married to Kellys.
- And we’re way into birds, enough to both have our own
stories about large, beautiful birds (not
Thanksgiving turkeys) stored for a time in our freezers. (Jeff grew up
surrounded by, among other things, hundreds of exotic parrots.)
It also didn’t take us long to get into the uncomfortable,
sad, and mysterious subject of death. As Pablo Neruda puts it, the “little
deaths” of individual lives; the big, monumental deaths and extinctions of entire
species, nations, and civilizations; and what problems and questions these pose
for collectors and artists like him. Though the image I was originally sent
described the piece he was working on as a mounted white rhino, he soon clarified
that it was actually a black rhino, which he’d found at an antique shop in
pretty bad disrepair. There are several subspecies of black rhinos, most of
them either completely extinct, or at some critical stage of endangered
survival. Though one desperately wishes to be hopeful, these are among the too
many creatures who have been hunted, chased, and displaced to the point of what
we call “functional extinction.” The living bond between a life and its life
place is broken and it becomes an object.
Although a certain kind of extinction is as old as life
itself, the idea of extinction, our modern understanding of it, has only been
around for about 200 years. Aristotle wrote ten books on natural history
without extinction ever crossing his mind. Medieval, Renaissance, and
Enlightenment Europe had never considered the idea a possibility either. Thomas
Jefferson had come across giant fossils of New World lions, mammoths, and sloths, and
fully expected Lewis and Clark to bring such things back from their expedition,
alive and well on the American frontiers. Until the early 19th
century it was widely believed that there was no place for extinction in the
economy of creation. Imagine this world! Complete with the same fullness as on
the morning of Genesis’ seventh day.
But we have these remnant bodies, these objects, many of them anyway.
Forms of life now passed into history. What to make of them now, with their attendant beauty, and often shame? Jeff and I
discussed our own experience of human lust and covetousness, greed and desire,
both the bad and the good. His work with these sculptures (there are two of
them) places obese human children (the “mammon twins,” as he affectionately refers to them) on the backs of
magnificent creatures, borne in a pageant of elaborate plunder and excess. Gold
coins and splendid instruments, narwhal tusks and oryx horns, penguin wings and
shrunken head replicas.
These things raise questions. How do we, the most privileged generation of life on earth, reckon with our complicated history and our prospective future? Again, both the beauty and the shame of it. In what ways can our seeking after anything virtuous, lovely, or of good report, or praiseworthy (these finest pearls) condemn us to repeating history, and in what ways might they redeem us from it? And what limits might there be on such redemption? In composing these sculptures, Jeff recognized and included the ancient conceptual theme of Arcadia as useful in framing some of these questions in relation to death, horror, and desecration entering the garden.
These things raise questions. How do we, the most privileged generation of life on earth, reckon with our complicated history and our prospective future? Again, both the beauty and the shame of it. In what ways can our seeking after anything virtuous, lovely, or of good report, or praiseworthy (these finest pearls) condemn us to repeating history, and in what ways might they redeem us from it? And what limits might there be on such redemption? In composing these sculptures, Jeff recognized and included the ancient conceptual theme of Arcadia as useful in framing some of these questions in relation to death, horror, and desecration entering the garden.
eye of providence
cacti potted in foundry crucibles
Jeff explains lost wax, male and female parts, and where (scary, fat) babies come from.
the naming of parts: tzanzas
crucifixion & canvas Ute kayaks
Wiz the three-legged terrier (sweetheart)
(A slightly revised version of this post has also been posted to the--much fancier--blog By Common Consent.)
No comments:
Post a Comment